Most contractors already know they need CAR / EAR for construction and fit-out works — it's usually written into the contract. But more and more survey, building-inspection and site-monitoring work is now done by drone, and that's the gap most people haven't thought through: your Public Liability policy very likely excludes "aircraft" outright, and a drone incident may not be covered at all.
| Cover | What it covers | Typical buyer |
|---|---|---|
| Contractors' All Risks (CAR) | Physical damage to works-in-progress (materials, structures), plus third-party bodily injury / property damage liability arising from the works | Building, renovation and demolition contractors |
| Erection All Risks (EAR) | Damage during installation, testing and commissioning of mechanical/electrical plant — the M&E counterpart to CAR | M&E contractors, large plant installations (power plants, factory equipment) |
| Machinery breakdown cover | Sudden, unforeseen machinery damage (as distinct from "all risks" perils) — boiler & pressure vessel cover can be bundled in | Property/factory owners with fixed mechanical/electrical plant |
| Electronic Equipment Insurance (EEI) | All-risks physical damage cover for electronic/computer/control systems | Businesses dependent on electronic systems |
There's no general Hong Kong ordinance forcing contractors to buy CAR / EAR — the only genuinely mandatory cover is Employees' Compensation Insurance (Cap. 282). But standard construction contracts — like the Housing Authority's General Conditions of Contract for Building Works, clauses 5.14 and 5.33 — write the requirement to hold CAR straight into the contract terms before work can even start. So without a contract clause you don't strictly have to buy it, but once there's a clause, it's non-negotiable.
Survey, building inspection, slope monitoring, progress tracking — drone use in Hong Kong's engineering sector is becoming routine: the Hong Kong Institution of Engineers has reported drone photogrammetry used for 3D point-cloud survey modelling on the Loop's Bridge ST01 project, and the Geotechnical Engineering Office under CEDD is piloting drone-based slope inspection at scale. As "aerial engineering work" spreads, the coverage gap around it matters more.
| Drone category | Third-party liability insurance |
|---|---|
| Category A1 (≤250g) | No insurance requirement under law |
| Standard A2 (250g–7kg, within standard limits) | Not yet mandatory — a future HK$5 million minimum is already written into law, pending a Gazette commencement notice from the Director-General of Civil Aviation |
| Advanced Operations (all Cat. B/C, or any flight beyond standard limits) | Legally mandatory — minimum HK$10 million (Cat A/B), HK$15 million (Cat C, ≤75kg), or HK$20 million (Cat C, >75kg) |
Source: Small Unmanned Aircraft Order (Cap. 448G) ss. 11(1)(c), 12; CAD Safety Requirements Document for Small Unmanned Aircraft Operations, §9.1–9.2.
Engineering-focused drone work — wide-area aerial survey, beyond-visual-line-of-sight flights, flights near restricted zones — will in practice often qualify as Advanced Operations or Cat B/C flights, meaning insurance is very likely already a legal requirement, not just a "nice to have." Meanwhile your company's Public Liability policy typically carries an aircraft exclusion and may not cover a drone-related claim at all — these are two separate things to check.
The "aircraft" exclusion in a standard PL policy very likely catches drones too — you need a dedicated product for drone third-party liability.
CAR/EAR cover the "works" — works-in-progress and materials — not equipment the contractor brings on site, like a drone, if it's damaged.
If a drone survey or inspection report turns out to be professionally negligent, that's a Professional Indemnity matter — separate from in-flight third-party liability or hull damage, and worth planning for separately.
We'll help you check what your construction contract actually requires, and where the gap sits around drone operations.
Not sure what you need? Try the 5-question coverage check →